Skip to content
  • Home
  • About
  • Ask Work Watch
  • Dorsey’s L&E Practice
  • Disclaimers
Dorsey & Whitney LLP
  • Home
  • About
  • Ask Work Watch
  • Dorsey’s L&E Practice
  • Disclaimers
Quirky Question # 175: In-House Counsel Barred From Qui Tam Action Against Former Employer

Quirky Question # 175: In-House Counsel Barred From Qui Tam Action Against Former Employer

July 7, 2011 

by Dorsey & Whitney

Question: I know you have written in the past about former in-house counsel suing their former employers in connection with their terminations. We have a slightly different twist on that situation. Our former in-house counsel has filed a qui tam...

VIEW ALL POSTS ABOUT: Attorney-Client Privilege, Whistleblower Claims
Quirky Question # 155, Privilege Issues

Quirky Question # 155, Privilege Issues

August 30, 2010 

by Dorsey & Whitney

Quirky Question # 155 A class action discrimination lawsuit was filed against our company. The proposed class included all African American employees who were employed during a specified time period. This group includes our former Vice President of Human Resources....

POSTED IN Attorney-Client Privilege
In-House Counsel as Whistleblower, Kidwell vs. Sybaritic, Inc.

In-House Counsel as Whistleblower, Kidwell vs. Sybaritic, Inc.

July 12, 2010 

by Dorsey & Whitney

The Minnesota Supreme Court finally has ruled on Kidwell v. Sybaritic, Inc., Nos. A07-584 and 788 (June 24, 2010), the “in-house counsel as whistle-blower” case that was pending before it for more than 18 months. Unfortunately, the Court’s ruling has...

POSTED IN Attorney-Client Privilege, Retaliation, Whistleblower Claims
Reviewing Employee’s Email, Quirky Question # 144

Reviewing Employee’s Email, Quirky Question # 144

April 19, 2010 

by Dorsey & Whitney

Quirky Question # 144: I’m confused.  I thought we could review our employee’s email communications when sent out on our company’s equipment.  Our electronic communications policy states clearly that we reserve the right to do so. I also thought we...

VIEW ALL POSTS ABOUT: Attorney-Client Privilege, Litigation Issues
Searching a Former In-House Counsel’s Computer, Quirky Question # 111

Searching a Former In-House Counsel’s Computer, Quirky Question # 111

September 8, 2009 

by Dorsey & Whitney

Quirky Question # 111: We fired one of our in-house counsel.  He now has sued us for a variety of claims, all of which we think are bogus.  At the time his employment ended, we required him to turn in...

VIEW ALL POSTS ABOUT: Attorney-Client Privilege, Discipline and Discharge, Litigation Issues
Litigation by In-House Counsel, Quirky Question # 50

Litigation by In-House Counsel, Quirky Question # 50

August 4, 2008 

by Dorsey & Whitney

Quirky Question # 50: We are a small to mid-size company, with a relatively small legal department.  We have a General Counsel.  He, in turn, supervises two other attorneys.  The General Counsel joined our company about two years ago, and...

VIEW ALL POSTS ABOUT: Attorney-Client Privilege, Common Law Claims, Discipline and Discharge, Retaliation
Email Communications with Lawyer, Quirky Question # 18

Email Communications with Lawyer, Quirky Question # 18

January 28, 2008 

by Dorsey & Whitney

Quirky Question # 18: We recently terminated one of our executives.  One of our standard practices when we terminate a senior executive is to check carefully his/her email communications for the preceding twelve months.  When we checked this executive’s email...

VIEW ALL POSTS ABOUT: Attorney-Client Privilege, Discipline and Discharge

Follow:

About

Published by attorneys in Dorsey’s Labor & Employment practice group, Dorsey Work Watch explores the legal and cultural forces shaping today’s workplace and provides a balanced perspective on federal trends and the nuances created by evolving state and local laws and regulatory changes.

Dorsey Work Watch offers insights to help executives, managers, in-house counsel, and HR professionals in managing challenges in the dynamic workplace, making informed decisions while managing risks.

Subscribe to Blog Via Email

Editors

avatar for Jack SullivanJack Sullivan

Jack is a Partner in Dorsey’s Labor & Employment group, where he focuses his practice on employment adv...

avatar for Nisha VermaNisha Verma

Nisha has delivered results for her clients with respect to all aspects of employment litigation, including com...

Authors

avatar for Aaron GoldsteinAaron Goldstein

Aaron is a Partner in Dorsey’s Labor & Employ...

avatar for Hannah GreenHannah Green

Hannah is an associate in the Costa Mesa offic...

avatar for Michelle HaynesMichelle Haynes

Michelle’s practical and thorough approach to l...

avatar for Susan LorencSusan Lorenc

Susan is a strategic labor and employment advisor...

avatar for Nick PappasNick Pappas

Nick litigates and counsels with respect to com...

avatar for Ketul PatelKetul Patel

Ketul advises employers on the full spectru...

Search

Popular Topics

  • Wage and Hour Issues
  • Class and Collective Actions
  • Litigation Issues
  • At Will Employment
  • Wage and Hour Issues
  • Employee Handbook / Policies

Other Topics

Disclaimer

By accessing the Dorsey Work Watch blog, you are requesting information. The information you are requesting is not legal advice, advertising or solicitation. Transmission and receipt of the materials on the blog do not constitute legal advice, establish an attorney-client relationship, or create any duty of Dorsey to any reader. An attorney-client relationship with Dorsey may be established only by an engagement letter signed by a Dorsey lawyer. Information sent to Dorsey by persons who are not clients of the firm is not subject to any duty of confidentiality on the part of the firm.

The information on the blog may be changed without notice and is not guaranteed to be complete, correct or up-to-date, and may not reflect the most current legal developments. The opinions expressed on the blog are the opinions of the authors only and not those of Dorsey.

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING
Some of the content on this blog is considered Attorney Advertising under the applicable rules of certain states. Results depend on a number of factors unique to each matter. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

PRIVACY POLICY STATEMENT
The privacy policy statement is set out at Data Privacy | Dorsey.

The information on the blog may be changed without notice and is not guaranteed to be complete, correct or up-to-date, and may not reflect the most current legal developments. The opinions expressed on the blog are the opinions of the authors only and not those of Dorsey.

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING
Some of the content on this blog is considered Attorney Advertising under the applicable rules of certain states. Results depend on a number of factors unique to each matter. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

PRIVACY POLICY STATEMENT
The privacy policy statement is set out at Data Privacy | Dorsey.

Latest Posts

  • PAGA State of Play – Reform, Regulation, and Lasting Leverage
  • Illinois Employment Law Updates for 2026: What Employers Need to Know
  • Amendments to New York City’s Earned Safe and Sick Leave Law
  • One Year In: What We Know About The EEOC’s Approach to Employer DEI Programs
  • Ryan Gehbauer Joined Dorsey & Whitney in Dallas as Partner in Labor & Employment Group
  • Washington State Prohibits Non-Competes and Many Non-Solicitation Agreements
  • “At-Will” Employment in the U.S. – It’s a Trap!
  • Susan Lorenc Joined Dorsey & Whitney in Chicago as Partner in Labor & Employment Group
  • Nisha Verma on DOL’s Independent Contractor Rule in HR Dive
  • Employment Claims in the UK and US, A Comparison of Two Common Law Regimes

Address

Dorsey & Whitney

Minneapolis
50 South Sixth Street
Suite 1500
Minneapolis, MN 55402-1498

T: (612) 340-2600
F: (612) 340-2868

Labor & Employment News, Events, & Publications



Labor & Employment News, Events, & Publications
  • Disclaimers
  • Terms of Service

Dorsey Work Watch © 2026 Dorsey & Whitney LLC All Rights Reserved

Cleantalk Pixel